Survey Results

1. Webheads in Action Online Convergence 2005
1. I am a....
  Response Percent Response Total
Presenter
16.9% 14
Participant
65.1% 54
Presenter and participant
18.1% 15
Total Respondents   83
(skipped this question)   1
2. How many synchronous (live) sessions did you attend as a participant?
  Response Percent Response Total
0-3
36.1% 30
4-6
41% 34
7-10
9.6% 8
10 +
13.3% 11
Total Respondents   83
(skipped this question)   1
3. SPECIFIC FEATURES
Please, rate each of the following aspects of the convergence.
Excellent Good Acceptable Needs Improvement Didn't use Response Average
1.Call for Papers
30% (24) 23% (19) 4% (3) 2% (2) 41% (33) 3.01
2.Proposal submission form
24% (19) 25% (20) 4% (3) 1% (1) 46% (37) 3.21
3.Pre-conference announcements
45% (37) 35% (29) 5% (4) 7% (6) 7% (6) 1.96
4.The http://wiaoc.org portal
39% (31) 40% (32) 8% (6) 10% (8) 4% (3) 2.00
5.The Moodle portal
30% (25) 42% (35) 14% (12) 6% (5) 7% (6) 2.18
6.Moodle Forums
22% (18) 35% (29) 15% (12) 5% (4) 23% (19) 2.72
7.Learning Times presentations
58% (48) 28% (23) 5% (4) 2% (2) 7% (6) 1.73
8.Alado presentations
32% (25) 24% (19) 3% (2) 9% (7) 33% (26) 2.87
9.Worldbridges Streaming
39% (31) 20% (16) 8% (6) 2% (2) 31% (25) 2.68
10.Tapped In presentations
25% (20) 17% (14) 10% (8) 4% (3) 44% (36) 3.26
11.Tapped In Online assistance
32% (26) 15% (12) 4% (3) 1% (1) 48% (39) 3.19
12.Help Pages
22% (18) 26% (21) 10% (8) 8% (6) 34% (27) 3.04
13.Keynote speakers
52% (42) 19% (15) 6% (5) 1% (1) 21% (17) 2.20
14.Presentations
52% (41) 35% (28) 5% (4) 1% (1) 6% (5) 1.75
15.Dynamic schedule
51% (40) 28% (22) 6% (5) 6% (5) 8% (6) 1.91
16."Working" schedule
43% (33) 29% (22) 12% (9) 5% (4) 12% (9) 2.14
17.Frappr Photo Map
47% (37) 27% (21) 6% (5) 4% (3) 16% (13) 2.16
Total Respondents   83
(skipped this question)   1
4. GENERAL IMPRESSIONS
Please, rate each of the following aspects of the convergence
Excellent Good Acceptable Needs improvement Did not help Response Average
1.Overall organization
60% (50) 33% (27) 5% (4) 1% (1) 1% (1) 1.51
2.Clarity of instructions to participants
36% (30) 40% (33) 12% (10) 10% (8) 2% (2) 2.02
3.Information dissemination
43% (35) 43% (35) 9% (7) 5% (4) 1% (1) 1.79
4.Help from other participants
58% (46) 26% (21) 5% (4) 2% (2) 9% (7) 1.79
5.Help from asynchronous resources
40% (32) 32% (26) 11% (9) 9% (7) 9% (7) 2.15
6.Quality of conference in general
60% (50) 33% (27) 4% (3) 4% (3) 0% (0) 1.51
7.Benefit to participants
72% (59) 18% (15) 4% (3) 4% (3) 2% (2) 1.46
Total Respondents   83
(skipped this question)   1
5. Do you have any comments regarding connecting to or using any of the technology?         (click on "view" to read responses)
 Total Respondents  
51
(skipped this question)   33
6. Any other comments you would like to share with us?                                                     (click on "view" to read responses)
 Total Respondents  
50
(skipped this question)   34
7. In general, how would you rate this conference?
  Response Percent Response Total
Excellent
67.9% 55
Good
27.2% 22
Acceptable
2.5% 2
Needs Improvement
1.2% 1
Not useful
1.2% 1
Total Respondents   81
(skipped this question)   3